Publicación:
Comparison of PBM and ANPM models for predicting grinding product size distributions

dc.contributor.advisorBuiles Toro, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorLuján González, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.authorRestrepo Lopera, Juan Pablo
dc.coverage.spatialMedellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degreeseng
dc.creator.emailjlujang2@eafit.edu.cospa
dc.creator.emailjurest82@eafit.edu.cospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T20:19:43Z
dc.date.available2020-07-22T20:19:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractGrinding is a very important industrial operation that draws up to 4% of the global electricity consumption. It is imperative to predict accurately the appropriate retention times necessary for a given size reduction to minimize the wasted energy invested in overgrinding. However, the most common models for scaling, such as Bond, could lead to a design risk on the order of ± 20% due to their assumption that a single particle size can describe the entire particle size distribution. Thus, different approaches (both phenomenological and non- phenomenological) need to be explored. In the present work, a population balance model is compared with an algebraic statistical model, to predict the evolution of particle size distribution over time, assessing them in terms of accuracy, robustness, and computational complexity. Even though the population balance model had a lower accuracy and higher mathematical complexity its predictions were physically coherent, which made it a more robust model for extrapolating to different initial conditions and milling times. It is important to note that due to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, experimental information was limited, which inhibited an independent validation of the models, and an overfitting analysis for the ANPM.spa
dc.description.degreelevelTrabajospa
dc.description.degreenameIngeniero(a) de Procesosspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.ddc658.51 L953
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad EAFIT
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.eafit.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10784/17079
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFITspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería Procesosspa
dc.publisher.facultyEscuela de Ingenieríaspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Procesosspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.subjectBalances poblacionalesspa
dc.subjectMoliendaspa
dc.subjectTrituraciónspa
dc.subjectDistribución de tamaño de partículaspa
dc.subject.lembPLANIFICACIÓN DE LA PRODUCCIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembMODELOS MATEMÁTICOSspa
dc.subject.lembESTADÍSTICA INDUSTRIALspa
dc.subject.lembCONSUMO DE ENERGÍAspa
dc.titleComparison of PBM and ANPM models for predicting grinding product size distributions
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TP
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
JuanCamilo_LujanGonzalez_JuanPablo_RestrepoLopera_2020.pdf
Tamaño:
759.69 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
aprobacion_trabajo_grado_eafit.pdf
Tamaño:
497.8 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Constancia aprobación trabajo de grado
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
formulario_autorizacion_publicacion_obras.pdf
Tamaño:
957.27 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Formulario de autorización de publicación de obras
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.5 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: