Informes de investigación

URI permanente para esta colección

https://hdl.handle.net/10784/25554

Examinar

Examinando Informes de investigación por Autor "Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - IMPLICACIONES ETICAS DE LA IMPLEMENTACION DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN EL PROCESO JURISDICCIONAL
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Hincapié Velásquez, Valentina; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    Ethical implications of implementing artificial intelligence in the judicial process are critically examined. This raises questions regarding the ethical consequences of applying artificial intelligence and using related technologies, particularly concerning impartiality, judicial independence, and the requirement to provide reasoning for judicial decisions as a manifestation of the fundamental rights to due process and effective judicial protection.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - NECESIDAD DE CRITERIOS CONSTANTES DE ESTANDARES PROBATORIOS EN CASOS DE VIOLACIONES DE DERECHOS HUMANOS ANTE LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS.
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Hincapié Giraldo, Alejandro; Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Orozco Echeverría, Juan Luis; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Moreno Obando, Juliana; Osorio Álvarez, Mariana; Díez Velásquez, Manuela; Restrepo Lemos, Pablo; Cataño Villa, Simón; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    This paper addresses the different standards of proof that have been traditionally proposed by the doctrine, in addition to the main criticisms that have been made of these systems; the way in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has resorted to these criteria in various decisions of massive human rights violations -in view of the fact that its rules of procedure do not expressly embrace this concept-; and finally, the way in which the standard of 'preference of good explanations not defeated' proposed by Rodrigo Coloma, could contribute to the determination of the truth and the reduction of the Court's discretion in the resolution of these cases.