Informes de investigación

URI permanente para esta colección

https://hdl.handle.net/10784/25554

Examinar

Examinando Informes de investigación por Fecha de publicación

Filtrar resultados por año o por mes:
Mostrando 1 - 5 de 5
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    "Sobre las lecturas escindidas de la Constitución de 1991."
    (2012) MONTOYA, M.; MONTOYA, M.
    El desarrollo de la Constitución de 1991 en estos veinte años ha dado lugar a una lectura escindida de la Carta, es decir, una manera de abordar el texto constitucional...
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - APLICACION DE LOS ESTANDARES DE LA PRUEBA POR JUECES Y ARBITROS
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2019) García Brun, Álvaro José; Hurtado Aristizábal, Andrés; Gómez Franco, Carmen; Trujillo Montoya, Carolina; Meza Montoya, Daniel; Uribe, Juan Rafael; Lotero Aguirre, Juan Sebastián; Henríquez Kitchen, María José; Sierra Negrete, María Paula; Zuluaga Mejía, Ricardo; Giraldo Moreno, Sofía; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    This study explores the knowledge that both judges and arbitrators possess regarding the concept of the standard of proof and its application, as well as the lack of understanding of this concept when rendering judgment. While the concept is identified, there are conceptual gaps in its application, resulting in inadequate implementation. Additionally, it was observed that the applied standard sometimes becomes more stringent than what is established for certain processes. Furthermore, it has become evident that applying these standards makes it challenging to establish objective criteria.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL: NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EL DERECHO PROCESAL
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2020) Hurtado Aristizábal, Andrés; Gómez Franco, Carmen; Trujillo Montoya, Carolina; Uribe, Juan Rafael; Lotero Aguirre, Juan Sebastián; Zuluaga Mejía, Ricardo; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Cortés Sánchez, Carolina; Posada Ríos, Manuela; Castaño Marín, Alejandro; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    The following study was conducted with the objective of evaluating the application of artificial intelligence in the judicial process, aiming to find a tool that could contribute to reducing congestion in the administration of justice. This led to the identification that a significant percentage of the cases handled by civil judges are executive processes. Therefore, it is proposed that some stages of these processes could be developed through artificial intelligence, particularly through the automation of certain phases.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - IMPLICACIONES ETICAS DE LA IMPLEMENTACION DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN EL PROCESO JURISDICCIONAL
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Hincapié Velásquez, Valentina; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    Ethical implications of implementing artificial intelligence in the judicial process are critically examined. This raises questions regarding the ethical consequences of applying artificial intelligence and using related technologies, particularly concerning impartiality, judicial independence, and the requirement to provide reasoning for judicial decisions as a manifestation of the fundamental rights to due process and effective judicial protection.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - NECESIDAD DE CRITERIOS CONSTANTES DE ESTANDARES PROBATORIOS EN CASOS DE VIOLACIONES DE DERECHOS HUMANOS ANTE LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS.
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Hincapié Giraldo, Alejandro; Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Orozco Echeverría, Juan Luis; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Moreno Obando, Juliana; Osorio Álvarez, Mariana; Díez Velásquez, Manuela; Restrepo Lemos, Pablo; Cataño Villa, Simón; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    This paper addresses the different standards of proof that have been traditionally proposed by the doctrine, in addition to the main criticisms that have been made of these systems; the way in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has resorted to these criteria in various decisions of massive human rights violations -in view of the fact that its rules of procedure do not expressly embrace this concept-; and finally, the way in which the standard of 'preference of good explanations not defeated' proposed by Rodrigo Coloma, could contribute to the determination of the truth and the reduction of the Court's discretion in the resolution of these cases.