Deliberation and emotion: notions for a simondonian critique of dialogical reason in Habermas
Fecha
2021-12
Autores
Chacón Preciado, Carlos
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad EAFIT
Resumen
Los modos de relacionamiento deliberativo implican el inacabamiento existencial del individuo, pero la transindividuación lo superpone en tanto portador de carga de ser para individuaciones futuras. En torno a esta idea actualizamos una oposición entre la colectividad alcanzada por los estándares del razonamiento al nivel de conductas intersubjetivas, y una colectividad pre lingüística, multimodal, física y emocional; entre Jürgen Habermas y Gilbert Simondon. El objeto es resituar al individuo y al colectivo en el ser, poniendo en entredicho lo que se considera propicio para vivir en versiones liberales de la colectividad (formación, deliberación, Estado de Dere_x0002_cho, espacio público, y demás similares). Abordamos unas cuantas flaquezas del hombre que razona, el despliegue histórico de su espacialidad, y sentamos las bases para una conclusión que, de la mano de la ética que es La individuación, nos permita abordar un pensamiento de lo colectivo que desborde la lógica y el relacionamiento intersubjetivo.
The modes of deliberative relation imply the existential unfinishedness of the individual, but transindividuation superimposes it as the bearer of the burden of being for future individuations. Around this idea we actualize an opposition between the collectivity reached by the standards of reasoning at the level of intersubjective behaviors, and a pre-linguistic, multimodal, physical and emotional collectivity; between Jürgen Habermas and Gilbert Simondon. The object is to resituate the individual and the collective in being, questioning what is considered conducive to living in liberal versions of collectivity (formation, deliberation, rule of law, public space, and the like). We address a few weaknesses of reasoning man, the historical unfolding of his spatiality, and lay the foundations for a conclusion that, hand in hand with the ethics that is individuation, allows us to approach a thought of the collective that overflows logic and intersubjective relationship.
The modes of deliberative relation imply the existential unfinishedness of the individual, but transindividuation superimposes it as the bearer of the burden of being for future individuations. Around this idea we actualize an opposition between the collectivity reached by the standards of reasoning at the level of intersubjective behaviors, and a pre-linguistic, multimodal, physical and emotional collectivity; between Jürgen Habermas and Gilbert Simondon. The object is to resituate the individual and the collective in being, questioning what is considered conducive to living in liberal versions of collectivity (formation, deliberation, rule of law, public space, and the like). We address a few weaknesses of reasoning man, the historical unfolding of his spatiality, and lay the foundations for a conclusion that, hand in hand with the ethics that is individuation, allows us to approach a thought of the collective that overflows logic and intersubjective relationship.