Evaluation of the structural behavior of three and four implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations by finite element analysis.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.citation.journalTitleJournal of prosthodontic researchspa
dc.contributor.authorCorrea S
dc.contributor.authorIvancik J
dc.contributor.authorIsaza JF
dc.contributor.authorNaranjo M
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidad EAFIT. Departamento de Ingeniería de Diseño
dc.contributor.researchgroupIngeniería de Diseño (GRID)spa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-12T21:12:13Z
dc.date.available2021-04-12T21:12:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-01
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: There is much controversy about the minimum number of implants and maximum cantilever length in mandible prosthetic restoration. Finite elements analysis of three and four implant-supported prostheses was performed to determine the stresses in the superstructure, implants and cortical bone and, therefore, the failure prediction for each restoration. METHODS: An edentulous mandible was modeled from CT scan images. Two finite element models of three and four implant-supported prostheses with cantilever lengths of 10 and 15 mm were created. Occlusal loads in different parts of the superstructure were applied and shear and normal stresses were calculated. RESULTS: Two failure criteria were analyzed: the von Mises criterion for isotropic materials (superstructure and implants) and the Tsai-Wu criterion for transversely isotropic material (cortical bone). Both criteria predict failure in the three implant-supported prosthesis for all cases analyzed. The same applies for the four-implant prosthesis of 15 mm cantilever length. However, four implants and a cantilever length of 10mm passed the failure criteria and were considered safe. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the patient analyzed showed that fixed support prostheses on three implants are not recommended from a structural point of view because they do not adequately support occlusal loads. Excessive stress in the superstructure and the cortical bone can be expected, which would anticipate the failure of the restoration. Fixed support prostheses on four implants with a cantilever length of 10mm properly resist occlusal loading.eng
dc.identifierhttps://eafit.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=1535
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpor.2011.07.001
dc.identifier.issn18831958
dc.identifier.issn22124632
dc.identifier.otherWOS;000209156800005
dc.identifier.otherPUBMED;22104623
dc.identifier.otherSCOPUS;2-s2.0-84869881910
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/28799
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
dc.relationDOI;10.1016/j.jpor.2011.07.001
dc.relationWOS;000209156800005
dc.relationPUBMED;22104623
dc.relationSCOPUS;2-s2.0-84869881910
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84869881910&doi=10.1016%2fj.jpor.2011.07.001&partnerID=40&md5=920a8f2dd0d689762d371a14153d08db
dc.rightshttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/issn/1883-1958
dc.sourceJournal of prosthodontic research
dc.subject.keywordarticleeng
dc.subject.keyworddental procedureeng
dc.subject.keywordfinite element analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordhistologyeng
dc.subject.keywordhumaneng
dc.subject.keywordmandibleeng
dc.subject.keywordmasticationeng
dc.subject.keywordtooth implanteng
dc.subject.keywordtooth prosthesiseng
dc.subject.keywordBite Forceeng
dc.subject.keywordDental Implantseng
dc.subject.keywordDental Modelseng
dc.subject.keywordDental Prosthesiseng
dc.subject.keywordImplant-Supportedeng
dc.subject.keywordDental Stress Analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordFinite Element Analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordHumanseng
dc.subject.keywordMandibleeng
dc.titleEvaluation of the structural behavior of three and four implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations by finite element analysis.eng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.typepublishedVersioneng
dc.type.localArtículospa

Archivos

Colecciones

Articulos