Publicación:
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLópez Carvajal, Liliana
dc.contributor.authorTamayo Plata, Mery Patricia
dc.contributor.authorVeléz, Iván Darío
dc.coverage.spatialMedellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degreeseng
dc.creator.emailjaiberthcardona@gmail.co
dc.creator.emaillililopez14@gmail.com
dc.creator.emailmptamayo@eafit.edu.co
dc.creator.emailidvelez@pecet-colombia.org
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-26T13:45:52Z
dc.date.available2018-06-26T13:45:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is toxic, has contraindications and a high cost. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Methods: Effectiveness was the proportion of healing, and safety with the adverse effects; these parameters were estimated from a controlled clinical trial and a meta-analysis. A standard costing were conducted. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. The uncertainty regarding effectiveness, safety and costs was determined through sensitivity analyses. Results: The total costs were $66,807 with Glucantime and $14,079 with thermotherapy. The therapeutic effectiveness rates were 64.2% for thermotherapy and 85.1% for Glucantime. The average cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between $721 and $1,275 for Glucantime and between $187 and $390 for thermotherapy. Based on the meta-analysis thermotherapy may be a dominant strategy. Conclusion: The excellent cost-effectiveness ratio of thermotherapy shows the relevance of its inclusion in guidelines for the treatment.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad EAFIT
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.eafit.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10784/12419
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFITspa
dc.publisher.departmentCentro Valor Públicospa
dc.publisher.facultyEscuela de Economía y Finanzasspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.subject.keywordCost-effectiveness analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordAnálisis costo-efectivospa
dc.subject.keywordCutaneous leishmaniasiseng
dc.subject.keywordLeishmaniasis cutáneaspa
dc.subject.keywordThermotherapyeng
dc.subject.keywordTermoterapiaspa
dc.subject.keywordGluconato de antimonio sódicospa
dc.subject.keywordColombiaspa
dc.titleCost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasiseng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.type.localDocumento de trabajo de investigaciónspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draft
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
WP-2018-03-JaiberthAntonioCardonaArias.pdf
Tamaño:
652.68 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Documento de trabajo de investigación
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.5 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Documentos de trabajo (working papers)