Examinando por Materia "PARTICIPACIÓN CIUDADANA - SABANETA (ANTIOQUIA, COLOMBIA)"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Publicación
    Hacia una política pública ambiental : análisis del proceso de agendamiento que ha realizado un colectivo ciudadano mesa ambiental de las condiciones ambientales del municipio de Sabaneta
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2018) Serna Hernández, Nestor Camilo; Galeano Tamayo, Oscar Daniel
    This article represents the result of a research about the analysis of the process of scheduling done by "Colectivo Mesa Ambiental" with the objective of taking into the agenda of Sabaneta's municipality local environmental problems. This research begins with a methodological and analytical pursuit, supported by scheduling theories and collective action which are determinant at identifying, defining and inscribing an issue in the public agenda.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Publicación
    La gobernanza colaborativa como herramienta para fortalecer la gestión municipal de emergencias : un estudio de caso en Sabaneta, Antioquia
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2026-05-20) González González, Yudy Ydali; García Jaramillo, Leonardo
    This paper analyzes collaborative governance as an approach to strengthen municipal emergency management in Colombia, based on a case study of the landslide and extreme rainfall that occurred in Sabaneta (Antioquia) on May 8, 2025. The national context reveals a high exposure to hydrometeorological and geological hazards, and although Law 1523 of 2012 promotes comprehensive and multi-hazard management, implementation gaps persist, leading to fragmented and reactive responses at the local level. Using a qualitative design based on a documentary review of regulations, territorial plans, technical reports, and specialized literature, the research employs Ansell and Gash's cyclical model and Emerson, Nabatchi, and Balogh's integrative framework as analytical lenses to examine initial conditions, institutional design, facilitative leadership, process dynamics, and resilience outcomes. The case highlights resource and capacity asymmetries, staff turnover, and administrative silos that hinder inter-institutional coordination, as well as community distrust that limits genuine participation and the sustainability of measures. While response protocols were activated (Unified Command Post, evacuations, shelters, aid, and mitigation works), these small triumphs are not consolidated without clear rules for transparency, access to information, and accountability. It is concluded that collaborative governance can facilitate the transition from response to proactive resilience if stable coordination spaces are institutionalized, municipal technical capacities are strengthened, and facilitative leadership is promoted, aimed at rebuilding trust and territorial co-responsibility.