Examinando por Materia "Derechos Humanos"

Mostrando 1 - 5 de 5
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    El impacto normativo de las ONG de carácter transnacional : una mirada al cumplimiento de estándares internacionales en materia de discapacidad en Colombia
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2019) López Uribe, Sara; Sarria Ocampo, Carlos Alberto; Gallo Vélez, Ana Silvia
    The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) was conceived as a Human Rights instrument that seeks the social development of persons with disabilities, which reaffirms the fundamental rights and freedoms of this population. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) play a fundamental role in the conception of the CRPD, being the first time they actively participated in the formulation of a treaty for the protection of Human Rights. For this reason, it is important to determine the normative impact and influence that these organizations generate in the internal order of States under the influence of the CRPD.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    ¿Por qué se prohíben y castigan algunas de nuestras acciones?
    (2012) Cadavid Quintero, Alfonso; Abad Restrepo, Ana Cristina; Arango Uribe, María Adelaida; Gómez Rico, Elena María; Muriel Gil, Luisa Fernanda; Uribe, José Ignacio; Ana Cristiba Abad Restreppo (abad@eafit.edu.co); Alfonso Cadavid (alcadavi@eafit.edu.co)
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - NECESIDAD DE CRITERIOS CONSTANTES DE ESTANDARES PROBATORIOS EN CASOS DE VIOLACIONES DE DERECHOS HUMANOS ANTE LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS.
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Hincapié Giraldo, Alejandro; Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Orozco Echeverría, Juan Luis; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Moreno Obando, Juliana; Osorio Álvarez, Mariana; Díez Velásquez, Manuela; Restrepo Lemos, Pablo; Cataño Villa, Simón; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    This paper addresses the different standards of proof that have been traditionally proposed by the doctrine, in addition to the main criticisms that have been made of these systems; the way in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has resorted to these criteria in various decisions of massive human rights violations -in view of the fact that its rules of procedure do not expressly embrace this concept-; and finally, the way in which the standard of 'preference of good explanations not defeated' proposed by Rodrigo Coloma, could contribute to the determination of the truth and the reduction of the Court's discretion in the resolution of these cases.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Profesión jurídica : abogados y acceso a la tierra en Colombia
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2019) Arroyave Velásquez, Lina María; Toro Valencia, José Alberto; Hoyos Ceballos, Esteban
    This article seeks to compare human rights lawyers who are members of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) and property law (civil law) lawyers in Colombia, who have specialized on the enforceability land property. The objective of this comparison is to identify the role that these legal advisers and NGOs have played in the processes to access and formalize land tenure. The article assumes that evidencing the practices and legal services provided by organized civil-society stakeholders, as well as lawyers who respond to interests, reveal the influence of these actors in the changes of power dynamics on land tenure. Depending on the legal frameworks and approaches given to the enforceability processes on the right to land, either by property law or Human Rights, the outcomes are contradictory. On the one hand, the processes of access to the individual land conducted under property law generates fewer distributive results; on the other hand, accessing to land tenure through public policy or Human Rights standards lead to the contrary outcome, meaning more distributive effects. In this sense, the hypothesis suggested is that the practices promoted by property law lawyers tend to reinforce the unequal structures of land tenure; whereas, the procedures anchored to Human Rights Law tend to counteract the inequity in such tenure. The proposed analysis enables the understanding of the practice of diverse legal perspectives and tools in the protection of the access to land and its effects in Colombia. For organized civil society actors, the use of the discourse of International Human Rights law is prevalent, while for lawyers with particular and individual interests, resorting to property law is the dominant practice.