Examinando por Materia "Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Análisis sobre la competencia del sistema interamericano para conocer de los casos previamente resueltos por la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz(Universidad EAFIT, 2019) Duque Vélez, Mariana; González Cifuentes, Sara; Toro Valencia, José AlbertoTransitional justice is a normative concept created under international and national law that provides temporary regulations to achieve a peaceful transition from war to peace. Under the Colombian government Peace Agreement with the FARC-EP the Special Jurisdiction for Peace is the transitional justice mechanism created under the observance of these parameters and with a restorative justice approach in favor of the victims. The Inter-American Human Rights System is the regional mechanism responsible for the promotion and protection of human rights in the continent. Considering the recent entry into force of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, it is important to analyze the eventual competence that the Inter-American Human Rights System would have in the cases previously resolved by this court. If the JEP, as in theory must happen, complies with the norms of international law and the inter-American standard, the competence of the Inter-American Human Rights System will be restricted, since the State itself would had already satisfied the main goal of the Inter-American field.Ítem Derechos de las mujeres : ¿son realmente universales? Análisis comparativo entre los sistemas interamericano y africano de derechos humanos(Universidad EAFIT, 2024) Osorio Echeverri, María Paula; Lorenzoni Escobar, LinaThis research paper critically analyzes the universality of women's human rights in a context of cultural pluralism, using their development in the universal, inter-American, and African human rights systems as a comparative framework. First, the theory of human rights is reviewed, and the evolution of international law and its protection systems is examined. The paper evaluates the situation of women and their differentiated rights in regional jurisprudence, conducting a comparative analysis of their development across these systems. Subsequently, a conciliatory vision is proposed that addresses both universalist and relativist concerns, allowing for the coexistence of perspectives within the heterogeneity of society. Finally, it reflects on contemporary challenges and the effectiveness of international instruments in protecting women's rights, as well as the role of regional systems, states, and civil society in their promotion from a gender perspective.