Examinando por Autor "Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Análisis de la responsabilidad civil en caso de una falla funcional en un vehículo operado con inteligencia artificial que resulte en daños a terceros
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2024) Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro; Gil Berrio, Manuela; Villa García, Luis Felipe
    This study will examine the implication of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with autonomous vehicles and its legal scopes, focusing on civil liability for functional failures. In addition, it will investigate whether the Colombian regulatory framework is prepared to address potential accidents caused by AI. For this purpose, two main areas will be explored: (i) the functioning of AI and (ii) the legal framework of tort liability in Colombia. Subsequently, the characteristics of AI and its dependence on human instructions will be analyzed to, finally, examine the theory of civil liability proposed by different authors and compare them with the legal perspective of foreign legal systems. This research seeks to understand and address the legal challenges of AI in autonomous vehicles, with the aim of contributing to the development of a fair and equitable legal framework in Colombia.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Proceso de ASC - NECESIDAD DE CRITERIOS CONSTANTES DE ESTANDARES PROBATORIOS EN CASOS DE VIOLACIONES DE DERECHOS HUMANOS ANTE LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS.
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Hincapié Giraldo, Alejandro; Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Orozco Echeverría, Juan Luis; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Moreno Obando, Juliana; Osorio Álvarez, Mariana; Díez Velásquez, Manuela; Restrepo Lemos, Pablo; Cataño Villa, Simón; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFIT
    This paper addresses the different standards of proof that have been traditionally proposed by the doctrine, in addition to the main criticisms that have been made of these systems; the way in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has resorted to these criteria in various decisions of massive human rights violations -in view of the fact that its rules of procedure do not expressly embrace this concept-; and finally, the way in which the standard of 'preference of good explanations not defeated' proposed by Rodrigo Coloma, could contribute to the determination of the truth and the reduction of the Court's discretion in the resolution of these cases.