Examinando por Autor "Streveler R.A."
Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Assessing the effectiveness of peer instruction in students' understanding of electric circuits concepts(AMER SOC ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019-01-01) Soto Perez R.A.; Ortega-Alvarez J.D.; Streveler R.A.; Universidad EAFIT. Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos; Desarrollo y Diseño de ProcesosThis paper describes the implementation of an active learning strategy, called Peer Instruction, in an undergraduate electric circuit analysis course offered at a large public university in Colombia. Peer Instruction is an instructional approach that fosters students' collaboration to increase conceptual understanding. Data was collected from three sections of the course mentioned above. In two sections, students attended a traditional class format (51 students) while another section (15 students) implemented the Peer Instruction methodology. The research question driving this project was whether Peer Instruction would produce significantly higher learning gains than the traditional blackboard and chalk approach. A difference was determined using a quasi-experimental study comparing the learning gains of the students in the traditional sections (i.e., the control group) versus those of the students in the Peer Instruction section (i.e., the experimental group). The learning gains were measured by pre/post application of an adapted version of the DIRECT concept inventory which was translated into Spanish. Preliminary results suggest that the implementation of a Peer Instruction approach in an electric circuit analysis course improves the performance of students on the adapted version of the DIRECT test. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Ítem From graduate students to faculty: Portraits of balance in the professional development plans of engineering graduate students(AMER SOC ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2017-01-01) Ortega-Alvarez J.D.; Streveler R.A.; Fentiman A.W.; Aggarwal H.W.; Biswas S.; Coventry B.S.; Hassan A.-R.; McNamara M.L.; Smriti N.P.; Universidad EAFIT. Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos; Desarrollo y Diseño de ProcesosThe job of a college engineering faculty member is multifaceted. Faculty are not only expected to teach and conduct research but also to write proposals, consult, network, engage in administrative duties, and the list continues. The relative importance and time allocated to these different functions vary according to the nature and focus of the institution and the interests of the faculty. However, engineering graduate students aspiring to careers in academe are not usually trained in the multiple facets of the profession. As a result, when they become faculty members they often struggle to find ways to balance the parallel and many times competing demands of these functions. This paper examines the professional development plans of six engineering graduate students with a marked interest in an academic career. These plans are one of the major deliverables of a three-credit graduate course at a large, research-intensive unive rsity. The overarc hing goal of this course, as stated on its syllabus, is to provide students with an opportunity to learn and practice the skills that complement and enhance classroom teaching and learning in a tenure-track faculty position, either at a research-inte nsive university or at an institution that focuses on undergraduate engineering education. The research questions that orientate the study are: What do the professional development plans of engineering graduate students portray about their striving for balance in their future faculty careers? How does writing a professional development plan with expert guidance in a formal class help these students prepare for a faculty position? The analysis of students' professional development plans as qualitative artifacts, under the lens of expectations and values, reveals a wide variety of approaches to the role of faculty. Subsequent individual reflection on these plans allowed researchers to gather insights into why students chose to focus on different perspectives of the faculty job. Finally, a follow-up group conversation with the students shows that beneath these different perceptions and expectations lies the idea of balance, evolved and transformed by the discussions and activities of the course. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.Ítem Special session: Fostering change: Application and implications of Palmer's movement approach to change(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017-01-01) Streveler R.A.; Pitterson N.P.; Smith K.A.; Ortega-Alvarez J.D.; Universidad EAFIT. Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos; Desarrollo y Diseño de ProcesosAccording to change literature, the multiplicity of levels and structures that exist within an organization makes organizational change a difficult process. Similarly, many challenges face any attempt to foster change in engineering education, due to the various layers that make up the field. Looking at the evolution of engineering education research (EER) as a field and the individual pathways of engineering education researchers, EER scholars have discussed a model for engineering education reform that draws from Palmer's Movement Approach to change. This special session introduces Palmer's approach as a framework to look at reforms that have already occurred, and envision possible paths for action toward desired changes. © 2017 IEEE.