Examinando por Autor "Salas Mazo, Daniel"
Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem La interpretación del art. 30 de la Ley 1393 de 2010 por parte de la UGPP : alternativas jurídicas para el empleador(Universidad EAFIT, 2023) Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Múnera Posada, ArmandoAs a result of the issuance of Law 1393 of 2010, specifically article 30, which establishes a rule for limiting non-constitutive labor payments of salary for the purpose of calculating the Base Contribution Income (IBC) used for the payment of Social Security contributions, the UGPP (Colombian entity responsible for overseeing and controlling social security contributions) provided an interpretation of this provision under its normative authority. However, this interpretation was subsequently subject to reinterpretation in a unification judgment by the Council of State. With the initial interpretation by the UGPP, several employers in Colombia were subjected to demands and sanctions. Nevertheless, with the new interpretation given by the Council of State, many of the charges and penalties imposed by the entity would lack a legal basis, resulting in financial harm to these employers. This work aims to determine various legal alternatives available within the Colombian legal framework for affected employers to restore their property rights.Ítem Proceso de ASC - IMPLICACIONES ETICAS DE LA IMPLEMENTACION DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN EL PROCESO JURISDICCIONAL(Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Hincapié Velásquez, Valentina; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFITEthical implications of implementing artificial intelligence in the judicial process are critically examined. This raises questions regarding the ethical consequences of applying artificial intelligence and using related technologies, particularly concerning impartiality, judicial independence, and the requirement to provide reasoning for judicial decisions as a manifestation of the fundamental rights to due process and effective judicial protection.Ítem Proceso de ASC - NECESIDAD DE CRITERIOS CONSTANTES DE ESTANDARES PROBATORIOS EN CASOS DE VIOLACIONES DE DERECHOS HUMANOS ANTE LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS.(Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Jaramillo Restrepo, Juan Pablo; Vélez, Ana Isabel; Hincapié Giraldo, Alejandro; Tamayo Restrepo, Alejandro; Londoño Henao, Carolina; Salas Mazo, Daniel; Orozco Echeverría, Juan Luis; Gómez Forero, Juan Felipe; Moreno Obando, Juliana; Osorio Álvarez, Mariana; Díez Velásquez, Manuela; Restrepo Lemos, Pablo; Cataño Villa, Simón; Posada Botero, José David; Universidad EAFITThis paper addresses the different standards of proof that have been traditionally proposed by the doctrine, in addition to the main criticisms that have been made of these systems; the way in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has resorted to these criteria in various decisions of massive human rights violations -in view of the fact that its rules of procedure do not expressly embrace this concept-; and finally, the way in which the standard of 'preference of good explanations not defeated' proposed by Rodrigo Coloma, could contribute to the determination of the truth and the reduction of the Court's discretion in the resolution of these cases.