The result is not a myth, as Sancinetti puts it. What has existed is a double treatment of the concept of result, which prevents consensus on its nature. While some identify it with any modification produced in the outside world, others equate it to violation of the rule.

Universidad Externado de Colombia2024-02-19202201208182https://hdl.handle.net/10784/33426The result is not a myth, as Sancinetti puts it. What has existed is a double treatment of the concept of result, which prevents consensus on its nature. While some identify it with any modification produced in the outside world, others equate it to violation of the rule.El resultado no es un mito, como plantea Sancinetti. Lo que ha existido es un doble tratamiento del concepto de resultado, que impide llegar a consensos sobre su naturaleza. Mientras algunos lo identifican con cualquier modificación producida en el mundo exterior, otros lo equiparan a infracción de la norma.application/pdfspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCopyright © 2022 Yesid Reyes AlvaradoThe result is not a myth, as Sancinetti puts it. What has existed is a double treatment of the concept of result, which prevents consensus on its nature. While some identify it with any modification produced in the outside world, others equate it to violation of the rule.El mito del resultadoarticleopenAccessResultMythLegal interestsLack of value of actionLack of value of resultInappropriate attemted crimeAllowed riskRisk disapprovedSocial adequacyViolation of the ruleResultadoMitoBien jurídicoDesvalor de acciónDesvalor de resultadoTentativa inidóneaRiesgo permitidoRiesgo desaprobadoAdecuación socialInfracción de la norma2024-02-19Reyes Alvarado, Yesid10.17230/nfp18.99.2Libre acceso