2019-10-042017-06-162539-12081794-5887http://hdl.handle.net/10784/14136En el presente estudio procuraremos determinar los dos ejes de la ética unamuniana, que, al estar vinculados con el dualismo antropológico “yo-íntimo” y “yo-público”, podríamos condensar en los conceptos de “bondad” y “obra”. Unamuno, en cuanto heredero del romanticismo y del existencialismo, consideró que lo fundamental, en términos axiológicos, era que los individuos aprendiesen a “ser buenos” y no a “hacer [meramente] el bien”, ya que solo a través de la pureza del sentir, es decir, de la “bondad ética”, el “sujeto moral” podría constituirse como una “persona” a través de sus “obras”. En este aspecto, la relación de la ética unamuniana con los “oficios” es decisiva, ya que cada “individuo” a través de su “profesión” está llamado a formar su “persona”.In this study, we seek to determine the two axes of Unamunian ethics, which are linked to the "I-intimate" and "I-public" anthropological dualism, and which could be condensed into the concepts of "goodness" and "work." Unamuno, as heir to romanticism and existentialism, considered that what was fundamental, in axiological terms, was for individuals to learn to "be good" and not to " [merely] do good," because only through the purity of feeling, that is, of "ethical goodness", the "moral subject" could become a "person" through his "works". In this regard, the relation of Unamunian ethics to "occupations" is decisive, since each "individual" through his "profession" is bound to mold his "being".text/htmlspaCopyright (c) 2017 Emanuel José Maroco dos Santosarticleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEthicsGoodnessIntentionAwarenessWork and mutual impositionÉticaBondadIntenciónConcienciaObra e imposición mutuaAcceso abierto2019-10-04Maroco dos Santos, Emanuel José10.17230/co-herencia.14.26.8