Prenolin: International benchmark on 1D nonlinear: Site-response analysis—validation phase exercise

dc.citation.journalTitleBULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
dc.contributor.authorRégnier J.
dc.contributor.authorBonilla L.-F.
dc.contributor.authorBard P.-Y.
dc.contributor.authorBertrand E.
dc.contributor.authorHollender F.
dc.contributor.authorKawase H.
dc.contributor.authorSicilia D.
dc.contributor.authorArduino P.
dc.contributor.authorAmorosi A.
dc.contributor.authorAsimaki D.
dc.contributor.authorBoldini D.
dc.contributor.authorChen L.
dc.contributor.authorChiaradonna A.
dc.contributor.authorDemartin F.
dc.contributor.authorElgamal A.
dc.contributor.authorFalcone G.
dc.contributor.authorFoerster E.
dc.contributor.authorFoti S.
dc.contributor.authorGarini E.
dc.contributor.authorGazetas G.
dc.contributor.authorGélis C.
dc.contributor.authorGhofrani A.
dc.contributor.authorGiannakou A.
dc.contributor.authorGingery J.
dc.contributor.authorGlinsky N.
dc.contributor.authorHarmon J.
dc.contributor.authorHashash Y.
dc.contributor.authorIai S.
dc.contributor.authorKramer S.
dc.contributor.authorKontoe S.
dc.contributor.authorKristek J.
dc.contributor.authorLanzo G.
dc.contributor.authorLernia A.D.
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Caballero F.
dc.contributor.authorMarot M.
dc.contributor.authorMcAllister G.
dc.contributor.authorMercerat E.D.
dc.contributor.authorMoczo P.
dc.contributor.authorMontoya-Noguera S.
dc.contributor.authorMusgrove M.
dc.contributor.authorNieto-Ferro A.
dc.contributor.authorPagliaroli A.
dc.contributor.authorPasseri F.
dc.contributor.authorRichterova A.
dc.contributor.authorSajana S.
dc.contributor.authorSantisi D’Avila M.P.
dc.contributor.authorShi J.
dc.contributor.authorSilvestri F.
dc.contributor.authorTaiebat M.
dc.contributor.authorTropeano G.
dc.contributor.authorVandeputte D.
dc.contributor.authorVerrucci L.
dc.contributor.researchgroupMecánica Aplicadaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T20:10:41Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T20:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.description.abstractThis article presents the main results of the validation phase of the PRENOLIN project. PRENOLIN is an international benchmark on 1D nonlinear (NL) site-response analysis. This project involved 19 teams with 23 different codes tested. It was divided into two phases; with the first phase verifying the numerical solution of these codes on idealized soil profiles using simple signals and real seismic records. The second phase described in this article referred to code validation for the analysis of real instrumented sites. This validation phase was performed on two sites (KSRH10 and Sendai) of the Japanese strong-motion networks KiK-net and Port and Airport Research Institute (PARI), respectively, with a pair of accelerometers at surface and depth. Extensive additional site characterizations were performed at both sites involving in situ and laboratory measurements of the soil properties. At each site, sets of input motions were selected to represent different peak ground acceleration (PGA) and frequency content. It was found that the code-to-code variability given by the standard deviation of the computed surface-response spectra is around 0.1 (in log10 scale) regardless of the site and input motions. This indicates a quite large influence of the numerical methods on site-effect assessment and more generally on seismic hazard. Besides, it was observed that sitespecific measurements are of primary importance for defining the input data in siteresponse analysis. The NL parameters obtained from the laboratory measurements should be compared with curves coming from the literature. Finally, the lessons learned from this exercise are synthesized, resulting also in a few recommendations for future benchmarking studies, and the use of 1D NL, total stress site-response analysis. © 2018, Seismological Society of America. All rights reserved.eng
dc.identifierhttps://eafit.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=8013
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120170210
dc.identifier.issn19433573
dc.identifier.issn137952spa
dc.identifier.otherWOS;000429116300021
dc.identifier.otherSCOPUS;2-s2.0-85044969937
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/29207
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSeismological Society of America
dc.publisher.departmentUniversidad EAFIT. Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánicaspa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044969937&doi=10.1785%2f0120170210&partnerID=40&md5=284606680db826537cc16e372d7bff66
dc.rightshttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/issn/0037-1106
dc.sourceBULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
dc.subject.keywordCodes (symbols)eng
dc.subject.keywordNumerical methodseng
dc.subject.keywordResearch laboratorieseng
dc.subject.keywordSeismologyeng
dc.subject.keywordSoilseng
dc.subject.keywordFrequency contentseng
dc.subject.keywordLaboratory measurementseng
dc.subject.keywordPeak ground accelerationeng
dc.subject.keywordResearch instituteseng
dc.subject.keywordSite characterizationeng
dc.subject.keywordSite response analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordSite-specific measurementeng
dc.subject.keywordStandard deviationeng
dc.subject.keywordSoil surveyseng
dc.subject.keywordearthquake engineeringeng
dc.subject.keywordpeak accelerationeng
dc.subject.keywordseismic hazardeng
dc.subject.keywordseismic responseeng
dc.subject.keywordsite characterizationeng
dc.subject.keywordsoil profileeng
dc.subject.keywordstrong motioneng
dc.titlePrenolin: International benchmark on 1D nonlinear: Site-response analysis—validation phase exerciseeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.typepublishedVersioneng
dc.type.localArtículospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
bssa-2017210.1.pdf
Tamaño:
2.45 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Colecciones