Water-based adhesive formulations for rubber to metal bonding developed by statistical design of experiments

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.citation.journalTitleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVESspa
dc.contributor.authorLasprilla-Botero, J.
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Láinez, M.
dc.contributor.authorAcosta, D.A.
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidad EAFIT. Departamento de Ingeniería de Diseño
dc.contributor.researchgroupIngeniería de Diseño (GRID)spa
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-14
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-12T21:14:11Z
dc.date.available2021-04-12T21:14:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.description.abstractWaterborne adhesives for rubber to metal bonding have been available since 1990. However, published information about their formulation has been limited, as proprietary restrictions are exercised by companies. As a consequence, the way these adhesives interact with substrates has not been studied extensively. With the aim of investigating the effect the components of a waterborne adhesive have on rubber to metal bonding, fractional factorial and surface response methodologies of design of experiments were employed in this study. Twenty six formulations were prepared with a polychloroprene latex as the adhesive polymer. Viscosity, wettability and non-volatile solids content were measured with each liquid adhesive, while the mechanical strength was evaluated by applying a tensile mechanical stress over cured solid adhesive films. Adhesion properties were evaluated by using a single lap-shear test on metal to metal joints and a pull-out test on rubber to metal joints. The results showed that the components with the largest relative influence on cohesive and adhesives forces were tackifier resin, silicon dioxide and polychloroprene latex type. In order to better understand the contributions of these variables, mathematical models correlating them with the response variables were obtained. This study is valuable in explaining how, through statistical methods, a waterborne adhesive for rubber to metal bonding can be formulated with a reasonably low number of experiments. © 2016 Elsevier Ltdeng
dc.identifierhttps://eafit.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=6228
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.007
dc.identifier.issn1437496
dc.identifier.issn18790127
dc.identifier.otherWOS;000392038600009
dc.identifier.otherSCOPUS;2-s2.0-84999277854
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/28924
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relationDOI;10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.007
dc.relationWOS;000392038600009
dc.relationSCOPUS;2-s2.0-84999277854
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84999277854&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijadhadh.2016.11.007&partnerID=40&md5=63b62018af26baf16dc844f35b041eb9
dc.rightshttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/issn/0143-7496
dc.sourceINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES
dc.subject.keywordAdhesiveseng
dc.subject.keywordDesign of experimentseng
dc.subject.keywordLatexeseng
dc.subject.keywordRubbereng
dc.subject.keywordStresseseng
dc.subject.keywordFractional factorialseng
dc.subject.keywordRubber-to-metal bondingeng
dc.subject.keywordSingle-lap shear testseng
dc.subject.keywordStatistical design of experimentseng
dc.subject.keywordSurface response methodologieseng
dc.subject.keywordTensile mechanical stresseng
dc.subject.keywordWater basedeng
dc.subject.keywordWater-based adhesiveseng
dc.subject.keywordMetalseng
dc.titleWater-based adhesive formulations for rubber to metal bonding developed by statistical design of experimentseng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.typepublishedVersioneng
dc.type.localArtículospa

Archivos

Colecciones

Articulos