The need for exploring alternatives in systemic intervention: Two "intentional" arguments

dc.contributor.authorVélez-Castiblanco, J.
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidad EAFIT. Departamento de Administraciónspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupAdministración y Organizacionesspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T16:50:39Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T16:50:39Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.description.abstractA recurrent guideline in many of the systems approaches to intervention is the need for exploring different alternatives. This guideline is present despite the different types of tools, the different paradigms or the arguments behind it. The purpose of this paper is not to contradict this, but to provide new arguments to this need that can be applied to the whole range of tools. The arguments shown here use ideas from language pragmatics and a combination of philosophy of action and complexity theory. What is central to the arguments presented is the concern with the intentions of the agents. In light of those, it is claimed that the advantages in the exploration of alternatives are hindered if they are not used in an intentional way.eng
dc.identifierhttps://eafit.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=2439
dc.identifier.isbn9781615678334
dc.identifier.otherSCOPUS;2-s2.0-84865649126
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/24716
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84865649126&partnerID=40&md5=59a3996b32a452fcdaa82be8e822b60a
dc.sourceThe Need For Exploring Alternatives In Systemic Intervention: Two "intentional" Arguments
dc.subject.keywordComplexity theoryeng
dc.subject.keywordCritical systems thinkingeng
dc.subject.keywordEmergenceeng
dc.subject.keywordFacilitation guidelineseng
dc.subject.keywordIntentioneng
dc.subject.keywordInterventioneng
dc.subject.keywordLanguage pragmaticseng
dc.subject.keywordMeaningeng
dc.subject.keywordMulti-methodologyeng
dc.subject.keywordComputational complexityeng
dc.titleThe need for exploring alternatives in systemic intervention: Two "intentional" argumentseng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePapereng
dc.typeconferencePapereng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.typepublishedVersioneng
dc.type.localDocumento de conferenciaspa

Archivos