Dinámicas de la narrativa ficcional y factual en las letras latinoamericanas del siglo XIX
Fecha
2017-10-31
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad EAFIT
Resumen
Descripción
Este artículo analiza las relaciones entre el discurso ficcional y el discurso factual en las narrativas hispanoamericanas del siglo xix. En el análisis se considera que ambos discursos establecen una estrecha relación al interior de los textos que se han visto como parte de la literatura de ficción, así como en aquellos que se han clasificado como ensayísticos. Desde ahí se abre la posibilidad de analizar en términos narrativos obras que históricamente se han ubicado en un entre-medio de la crítica historiográfica y la crítica literaria. El análisis propuesto considera el estudio de dos textos: El Periquillo Sarniento (1816), de José Joaquín Fernández de Lizardi, y Mariluán (1862), de Alberto Blest Gana.
This paper analyses the relationship between the fictional and factual discourse in the Spanish American narrative of the nineteenth century. This analysis considers that both discourses establish a close relationship inside the texts that have been seen as part of science fiction literature, as well as in those classified as essayistic. From this perspective, it opens up the possibility of analyzing those works in narrative terms that have historically been placed in between the historiographical critique and the literary critic. The proposed analysis suggests the study of two texts: El Periquillo Sarniento (1816), by José Joaquín Fernández de Lizardi, and Mariluán (1862), by Alberto Blest Gana.
This paper analyses the relationship between the fictional and factual discourse in the Spanish American narrative of the nineteenth century. This analysis considers that both discourses establish a close relationship inside the texts that have been seen as part of science fiction literature, as well as in those classified as essayistic. From this perspective, it opens up the possibility of analyzing those works in narrative terms that have historically been placed in between the historiographical critique and the literary critic. The proposed analysis suggests the study of two texts: El Periquillo Sarniento (1816), by José Joaquín Fernández de Lizardi, and Mariluán (1862), by Alberto Blest Gana.