La copia y la clonación para la conservación de la memoria histórica
Fecha
2016-06-27
Autores
Pastrana Salcedo, Tarsicio
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad EAFIT
Resumen
Descripción
Este artículo tiene el objetivo de plantear un debate conceptual sobre la memoria, como motivación principal para la conservación y restauración urbana arquitectónica en el ámbito académico. El objeto testimonio de la memoria se estudia en dos escalas: la urbana y la arquitectónica. A partir del análisis de la memoria histórica, como motivador principal, se busca la necesidad de conservar el objeto testimonio considerando el mensaje inherente, proponiendo fundamentos que justifiquen la copia y la clonación. Ambos conceptos opuestos a la tradición de conservar: la autenticidad y lo original. El planteamiento consiste en proporcionar alternativas y parámetros contemporáneos para los nuevos restauradores y conservadores patrimoniales. La memoria radica en el objeto, por la idea generada desde la forma y no en el material considerado insustituible
The aim of this paper is to create a conceptual debate about memory as a principal motivation for urban architectonic conservation and restoration at the academic level. The testimony object of memory is studied in two stages: urban and architectonic. Beginning with historic memory analysis as a prime motivator, a search has been undertaken to conserve the testimony object taking into account the inherent message, while proposing fundaments which justify the copy and the cloning; both concepts being at odds with the tradition of conserving the authentic and the original. The main idea is to provide alternatives and contemporary parameters for new restorers and peoples interested in heritage conservation. Memory finds itself firmly placed in the physical aspect of th.
The aim of this paper is to create a conceptual debate about memory as a principal motivation for urban architectonic conservation and restoration at the academic level. The testimony object of memory is studied in two stages: urban and architectonic. Beginning with historic memory analysis as a prime motivator, a search has been undertaken to conserve the testimony object taking into account the inherent message, while proposing fundaments which justify the copy and the cloning; both concepts being at odds with the tradition of conserving the authentic and the original. The main idea is to provide alternatives and contemporary parameters for new restorers and peoples interested in heritage conservation. Memory finds itself firmly placed in the physical aspect of th.