Theoretical considerations for the articulation of emotion and argumentation : a proposal for emotional regulation in deliberation

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorGómez Posada, Julder Alexanderspa
dc.contributor.advisorLemos Hoyos, Mariantoniaspa
dc.contributor.authorGonzález González, Manuela
dc.coverage.spatialMedellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degreeseng
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Estudios Humanísticosspa
dc.creator.emailmanuzalez@gmail.comspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T16:35:43Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T16:35:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIn this article emotion and its role in argumentation are presented to propose the use of emotional regulation during argumentative encounters, because of the way maladaptive emotions could, in some cases, difficult problem-solving during practical argumentation. To do so, I begin by defining emotions, focusing in primary emotions, considering some of the conceptual aspects of emotion and appraisal. Latter defining argumentation, concentrating in practical argumentation and deliberative dialogues, seen as an argumentative process that looks to decision-making and that could be affected by attention, memory and the adequate use of language; to then state the usual considerations of emotion during argumentation and the function of cognitive frames in emotion, reasoning and argumentation. Highlighting that emotion and argumentation are affected by cognitive processes, or reasoning, and that emotions can influence the argumentative encounter, this article resumes and explains the subject of emotional regulation as a process that could contribute to an adaptive expression of emotion and to a modification of maladaptive emotions, utilizing metacognitive strategies like attentional deployment, cognitive change and response modulation. This proposal centers around the possible contribution of the use these strategies for emotional regulation during deliberative processes, to allow more adaptive emotional responses, leading to better argumentative encounters, more efficient decision – making processes and improvement of the attention, memory and language used in deliberative dialogues.spa
dc.identifier.ddc168 G643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/13607
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Humanidades. Departamento de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Estudios Humanísticosspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.localAcceso cerradospa
dc.subjectEmocionesspa
dc.subjectEstrategias metacognitivasspa
dc.subject.keywordEmotionsspa
dc.subject.keywordArgumentationspa
dc.subject.keywordDeliberationspa
dc.subject.keywordEmotional regulationspa
dc.subject.keywordMetacognitive strategiesspa
dc.subject.lembEMOCIONES Y COGNICIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembLENGUAJE Y EMOCIONESspa
dc.subject.lembRAZONAMIENTOspa
dc.titleTheoretical considerations for the articulation of emotion and argumentation : a proposal for emotional regulation in deliberationspa
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersionacceptedVersioneng
dc.type.localTesis de Maestríaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Manuela_GonzalezGonzalez_2018.pdf
Tamaño:
490.89 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.5 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Estudios Humanísticos (tesis)