Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.citation.journalTitleArgumentation
dc.contributor.authorGonzález González M.
dc.contributor.authorGómez J.
dc.contributor.authorLemos M.
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidad EAFIT. Departamento de Humanidadesspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupEstudios en Psicologíaspa
dc.creatorGonzález González M.
dc.creatorGómez J.
dc.creatorLemos M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T16:44:22Z
dc.date.available2021-03-17T16:44:22Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-09
dc.description.abstractThe concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emotion as arguments, emotions to obtain the adherence of the audience and reflect the virtues of a good arguer. In this paper, we focus on understanding emotion and argumentation based on cognitive approaches that identify the relationship between the two elements, to propose the use of emotion regulation strategies in deliberative dialogue. Bearing in mind that the intensity of emotional responses may, in some cases, hamper one’s capacity to solve problems during a practical argument, we suggest that the use of emotion regulation strategies may favor deliberative dialogue, leading to more adaptive emotional responses and, in turn, better argumentative encounters, rendering decision-making more efficient. This article conceptualizes argumentation, revealing the historical path of emotion in studies on argumentation. It presents the concepts of emotion and emotion regulation, followed by the function of emotion regulation in argumentative encounters, illustrating this in two different situations. We conclude with the contribution made by the use of strategies for emotion regulation during deliberative dialogue. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.eng
dc.identifierhttps://eafit.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=8533
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10503-018-09476-6
dc.identifier.issn0920427X
dc.identifier.issn15728374
dc.identifier.otherWOS;000482796900003
dc.identifier.otherSCOPUS;2-s2.0-85059848788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/26637
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059848788&doi=10.1007%2fs10503-018-09476-6&partnerID=40&md5=ad5e3adf101dbfe038c8897b87befc02
dc.rightshttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/issn/0920-427X
dc.sourceArgumentation
dc.subject.keywordArgumentationeng
dc.subject.keywordDeliberationeng
dc.subject.keywordEmotion regulationeng
dc.subject.keywordEmotionseng
dc.titleTheoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberationeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.typepublishedVersioneng
dc.type.localArtículospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
s10503-018-09476-6.pdf
Tamaño:
791.4 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos