Examinando por Materia "rhetoric"
Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem COLOMBIAN NATIONAL GEOGRAPHY: THREE VERSIONS AND THE SAME TRADITION, 1827-1842(Universidad de Antioquia, 2017-01-23) Alba Patricia Cardona Zuluaga; Departamento de Humanidades; Estudios de Filosofía, Hermenéutica y NarrativasBased on a methodology that contrasts book publishing, this article aims to study the knowledge of national geography in Colombia based on versions established from the end of the 18th century to the beginning of the 19th century. More than being objective knowledge, the nation's geography constituted a crucible of several discourses which were still intertwined; they were part of the literary genre and of techniques comprised by rhetoric, and they were not part of an autonomous scientific discipline having its own procedures and instruments. Instead, it was a mixture of narrations of voyages, descriptions, and historical data and information whose purpose was to increase citizens' fervor and provide a common representation of the territory of people who were accustomed to learning more by hearing than by seeing.Ítem Multidimensionality and the Validity of Deliberation(Universidad EAFIT., 2020-01-01) Departamento de Humanidades; Estudios de Filosofía, Hermenéutica y NarrativasMany deliberation problems are multidimensional: the arguments for and against the proposed solutions appeal to values that belong to different dimensions. Thus, for instance, the arguments in favor of the proposal to negotiate to solve the problem of a domestic armed conflict may draw upon peace, whereas the arguments against it may invoke justice. This enables spokespeople to accept the premises of an argument without committing themselves to agreeing to its conclusion and justifying such an argument by emphasizing the premises of the opposing argument. ``Yes, a negotiation would reduce the number of deaths caused by political violence, but it would also lead to impunity; therefore, we should not negotiate.'' If this situation were indomitable, the deliberation arguments could never be valid; they could never be such to the extent that the acceptance of the premises would force whoever accepts them to agree to the conclusions. In this paper, some of the answers to this problem are considered: the answers of Kock (2009), Govier (2010), and Olmos (2016) as well as the response of Macagno and Walton (2018). Furthermore, several issues found in these answers are pointed out, and in an attempt to provide a solution, a distinction is made between the cases wherein it is possible and those wherein it is impossible to overcome the problem of deliberation multidimensionality.Ítem On Understanding in rhetorical elocution(Universidad EAFIT - Departamento de Humanidades, 2009-01-01) J. GOMEZ; Departamento de Humanidades; Estudios de Filosofía, Hermenéutica y NarrativasThe following paper deals with the relationship between elocution and understanding. The purpose is to present four arguments against the usual dissociation of understanding and rhetorical elocution: First, there are not philosophical reasons for to dissociate the natural way of speck and the rhetorical one. Second, because the discourse is always intentional a rhetorical dimension is inseparable from the meaning of the expressions. Third, the referential function of the rhetorical discourse depends of several functions associates with the rhetorical discourse. Fourth, the elocution can be understood as a reason for the choice of arguments, and not necessarily as an instrument for the persuasion.Ítem Rage, Outrage and Hope: A Glimpse of the Latin American Experience(Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Gloria Cárdenas, Luz