Examinando por Materia "Responsabilidad extracontractual del Estado"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    La lesión grave a bienes constitucional y convencionalmente protegidos como categoría intermedia entre las nociones de daño y de perjuicio.
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2019) Mesa Sánchez, Yuliana; Bustamante Uribe, Sara; Pérez Medina,Gonzalo Andrés
    This paper aims to show how by using the new category of damages known as violation or affectation of conventionally and constitutionally protected rights, the Colombian State Council has left the distinction between the concepts of daño and perjuicio that it had sustained in its jurisprudence. Also, this works presents how this new category of damage understood as the Council State decisions has a dual daño-perjuicio nature and scope.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Responsabilidad patrimonial y extracontractual del Estado por delitos cometidos por personas privadas de la libertad que se encuentran en instituciones penitenciarias, carcelarias o en prisión domiciliaria y reclusos que tienen permisos de salida vigilada y controlada
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Muñoz Marín, María Camila; Pérez Medina, Gonzalo Andrés
    According to the same title of this research, that is, patrimonial and extra-contractual responsibility of the State, the objective of this monograph is to understand or develop the nature of the relationship in which persons deprived of liberty (PDL) find themselves with the State, so that, from there, it can be concluded whether or not there is a possibility that this type of responsibility may be entrusted to the State, when a PDL, whether it is preventively detained for the possible commission of a crime or convicted of a punishable act, they also decide to continue committing crimes, by themselves or through another person, against a third party located outside the prison. Thus, for example, through the use of cell phones that are illegally inserted into the prison or when the PDL is not in the prison but in house arrest or under the figure of a state of freedom due to a supervised exit permit. and / or controlled; even in the case of a massive release, for example, like the one experienced recently, due to the Covid-19 virus pandemic. Therefore, we will begin by making a brief account of what is the tort liability of the State, to later analyze certain judgments of the Council of State that may be relevant to answer the question of this investigative work and, finally, extract from them elements that can be used to determine whether, in effect, it is possible to ascribe to the State non-contractual patrimonial responsibility when a PDL commits crimes while under its surveillance and control. The same as establishing whether it can be applied to other areas outside of penitentiary and jail institutions, for example, in the case that the individual has house arrest or is on conditional freedom or enjoying benefits such as special permits.