Examinando por Materia "Policy"

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2020-06-24) Fairclough, Isabela; Mădroane, Irina Diana; University of Central Lancashire; University of Timișoara
    This paper proposes a new theorization of the concept of “framing”, in which argumentation has a central role. When decision-making is involved, to frame an issue is to offer the audience a salient and thus potentially overriding premise in a deliberative process that can ground decision and action. The analysis focuses on the Roşia Montană case, a conflict over policy that developed over the years into an environmental social movement and, in September 2013, culminated in the most significant public protests in Romania since the 1989 Revolution. Starting from Entman’s understanding of framing as “selection and salience”, several framing strategies are identified and discussed, illustrating three main mechanisms. The way in which “selection and salience” operates via a range of argument schemes in a deliberative, decision-making process, in order to produce framing effects (including, possibly, collective mobilization) is illustrated with examples from the 2013 campaign and protests (slogans, websites, blogs and newspaper articles).
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    Chronicles about the city construction
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2009-12-21) Luis Piñón, Juan; Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    The Impact of the Legalization of Medical Marijuana in the Opioid Epidemic
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Plata Rúa, Alejandra; Acosta Mejía, Camilo Andrés
    We study the effects of marijuana legalization on demand for opioids in the United states. We tackle this question using transaction level data on the purchases of opioids by all pharmacies across the US between 2006 and 2012, together with a difference-in-discontinuity research design across two pairs of states: Michigan and Indiana, and New Mexico and Texas. We show that, on average, the legalization of marijuana has lead to a reduction in the purchases of opioids. However, this negative effects is mainly driven by a reduction along the Michigan-Indiana border, while there has been an increase along the New Mexico-Texas border. This ambiguous effects, which mimics the contradictory evidence found in the literature, suggest the existence of important heterogeneous effects and the need for further investigating such differences.