Logotipo del repositorio
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
  • Português
  • Iniciar sesión
    ¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?
Logotipo del repositorio
  • Comunidades
  • Listar por
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
  • Português
  • Iniciar sesión
    ¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?
  1. Inicio
  2. Examinar por materia

Examinando por Materia "PRUEBA (DERECHO) - COLOMBIA"

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Publicación
    La inteligencia artificial como prueba judicial : análisis desde la Sentencia T - 323 de 2024
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2025) Valencia Pineda, Myriam Paola; García Guevara, Valentina; González Jaramillo, José Luis
    This article examines Constitutional Court Ruling T-323 of 2024 and its impact on the use of AI in the evidentiary field. Through a doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis, it evaluates whether any of these tools can be considered a means of evidence in Colombian law, identifying the epistemological, legal, and procedural challenges that this implies. In particular, its relationship with the principle of evidentiary freedom will be studied and the evidence generated by this methodology of information production will be examined in the light of fundamental criteria such as authenticity, contradiction, and authorship.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Manual del abogado americano : tomo segundo / por D. J. E. de O., profesor de jurisprudencia
    (Bruxelas : Wahlen, 1839) Ochoa, Juan Eugenio de, 1784-1847
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    La simple declaración de parte como medio de prueba en el proceso civil en Colombia
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Castaño Salazar, Juan José; Posada Botero, Jose David
    Colombian judicial procedures have undergone major changes since the issuance of the General Process Code, Law 1564 of 2012. The most significant change was the move from a written system to a predominantly oral one that is developed through hearings. This has meant a restructuring of the process, of the hearings and, especially, of the procedural rules or maxims of the evidence. The magnitude of these changes has not been fully understood, which implies that controversies arise between those who maintain that there has been a true change in a specific matter and those who deny that there is a mutation in this same matter. For the specific case, some variations are identified in the regulation of the simple declaration of part with respect to the emergence of the General Code of the Process that, seem to indicate that the simple declaration of part was enshrined in this new statute as an autonomous means of proof and different from confession. However, there are those who deny the existence of the simple declaration of part as a means of proof and maintain that there has been no difference with respect to the previous regulation.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Los títulos de imputación utilizados por el Consejo de Estado para atribuir responsabilidad en eventos médico-hospitalarios: el precedente en materia Contencioso Administrativo como mecanismo para unificar la jurisprudencia
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2013) Gutiérrez Henao, Nataly; Vásquez Rico, Luisa María; Aramburo Calle, Maximiliano Alberto

Vigilada Mineducación

Universidad con Acreditación Institucional hasta 2026 - Resolución MEN 2158 de 2018

Software DSpace copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Configuración de cookies
  • Enviar Sugerencias