Examinando por Materia "Esquemas asociativos territoriales"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Publicación Factores de éxito en la asociatividad territorial: análisis de las provincias administrativas y de planificación –PAP-, una mirada comparativa entre la provincia del agua, bosques y turismo y la provincia Cartama(Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Rodríguez Monsalve, Oveida Patricia; Pérez Ramírez, Juan PabloThe document, “Success factors in territorial associativity in Colombia”, is an academic exercise that aims to identify which have been the legal, geographical, political, socioeconomic and cultural factors that limit or enhance the implementation of territorial associative schemes, in the modality of Administrative and Planning Provinces -PAP-, which arise in the light of the Organic Law of Territorial Planning 1454 of 2011, as a possibility to contribute to the processes of development and equity in the territories; This academic exercise emphasizes the analysis of two provincial schemes already established in Antioquia, through a comparative look at the success factors at each of them and eventually those elements where the result has not been as expected, which have been relevant in their development as provinces and that will be useful to build a guide to achieve their purposes more effectively and with a higher degree of success in the PAPs. For this exercise, the experiences of the Water, Forests and Tourism province in eastern Antioquia and the Cartama province in southwestern Antioquia will be addressed.Publicación Incidencia de los recursos del Sistema General de Regalías en las provincias administrativas y de planificación de Antioquia entre 2020 y 2024 : una revisión de su estructura organizacional, procesos de planeación y proyectos financiados(Universidad EAFIT, 2025) Posada Cardona, María Paula; Valencia Bedoya, Carlos Andrés; Ramos Villa, María EugeniaThis research evaluates the impact of the General System of Royalties (SGR) on five Administrative and Planning Provinces (PAP), Territorial Associative Schemes (EAT) in Antioquia, during the period 2020–2024: Cartama Province; Penderisco and Sinifaná Province; San Juan Province; Minero-Agroecological Province; and La Paz Province. Using a qualitative-interpretive approach that emphasizes territorial-institutional reflection, the study examines three core dimensions within the Provinces: their organizational structure, planning processes, and the types of projects financed with royalties. The findings will determine whether the SGR has strengthened municipal capacities for coordination and articulation, or whether it has confined them to operational and resource-management functions. The hypothesis argues that, although the SGR has expanded territorial financing opportunities, its implementation in Antioquia has not favored the PAPs nor significantly advanced their role as joint planning platforms, as originally envisioned in their institutional design. This study contributes to the debate on effective decentralization, territorial equity, and the strengthening of interjurisdictional collaboration in Colombia.