Examinando por Materia "Derecho de propiedad"

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Publicación
    Airbnb en Medellín : problemáticas actuales, derecho de propiedad y viabilidad de su prohibición
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2025) López Tobón, Antonia; Ortega Ramírez, Christian Daniel; Granda Jaramillo, Dany Alexander
    This monograph aims to carry out a detailed analysis of the regulatory and social effects brought to the city of Medellín by the implementation and use of platforms such as Airbnb. Currently, Airbnb is one of the most widely used tourism and hotel platforms worldwide, an unprecedented phenomenon that has revolutionized modern tourism and, of course, this has also become evident in the city of Medellin. Despite the numerous benefits it has brought to the national and municipal economy, the negative effects have had a significant weight, with the city's citizens themselves being the mainly affected. From this arises the need for this paper, an analysis of all the problems that its use has triggered , along with an investigation of the Property Law in Colombia and how it manages or fails to regulate these innovative platforms, to then evaluate, according to the information obtained, whether banning these platforms is the most viable solution to address the challenges the city has faced. The questioning of the current property law, and the measures proposed and adopted by the city's authorities in relation to these problems, is crucial when proposing solutions. Determining whether current regulations are able to cover the use and operation of platforms such as Airbnb not only represents a deep legal analysis, but also implies a search for alternatives so that this type of phenomena does not continue to occur in the city or, even worse, does not expand to other cities in Colombia.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Derecho de propiedad y protección a la mujer y a la familia. Las inconsistencias del legislador colombiano
    (Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, 2015-06-01) M. GAVIRIA; M. GAVIRIA
    El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar las normas jurídicas aprobadas por el legislador colombiano con la finalidad de proteger el derecho de propiedad sobre bienes inmuebles de la familia o de la mujer cabeza de familia
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Publicación
    Profesión jurídica : abogados y acceso a la tierra en Colombia
    (Universidad EAFIT, 2019) Arroyave Velásquez, Lina María; Toro Valencia, José Alberto; Hoyos Ceballos, Esteban
    This article seeks to compare human rights lawyers who are members of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) and property law (civil law) lawyers in Colombia, who have specialized on the enforceability land property. The objective of this comparison is to identify the role that these legal advisers and NGOs have played in the processes to access and formalize land tenure. The article assumes that evidencing the practices and legal services provided by organized civil-society stakeholders, as well as lawyers who respond to interests, reveal the influence of these actors in the changes of power dynamics on land tenure. Depending on the legal frameworks and approaches given to the enforceability processes on the right to land, either by property law or Human Rights, the outcomes are contradictory. On the one hand, the processes of access to the individual land conducted under property law generates fewer distributive results; on the other hand, accessing to land tenure through public policy or Human Rights standards lead to the contrary outcome, meaning more distributive effects. In this sense, the hypothesis suggested is that the practices promoted by property law lawyers tend to reinforce the unequal structures of land tenure; whereas, the procedures anchored to Human Rights Law tend to counteract the inequity in such tenure. The proposed analysis enables the understanding of the practice of diverse legal perspectives and tools in the protection of the access to land and its effects in Colombia. For organized civil society actors, the use of the discourse of International Human Rights law is prevalent, while for lawyers with particular and individual interests, resorting to property law is the dominant practice.