Examinando por Materia "Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Cumplimiento de la obligación internacional de investigar, juzgar y sancionar en la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz : estudio de caso 06 "victimización de miembros de la Unión Patriótica (UP) por parte de agentes del Estado"(Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Upegui Marín, María Fernanda; Toro Valencia, José AlbertoIn contexts of transition from war to negotiated peace, alternative transitional justice mechanisms in the fields of investigation, trial, punishment and reparations, such as the granting of benefits, case selection, amnesties and pardons, often collide with the State's obligation to investigate, prosecute and punish in accordance with International Human Rights Law. This paper examines the fulfillment of said international obligation, within the framework of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, taking as a reference the Macro Case No. 06 “Victimización de miembros de la Unión Patriótica (UP) por parte de agentes del Estado”. That is, in order to identify whether the Colombian State is fulfilling its obligation to investigate, prosecute and punish, while ensuring that the rights to truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition of the victims of serious human rights violations are respected.Ítem Derecho de acceso a la justicia y reparación directa : caducidad, seguridad jurídica y derecho a la reparación de víctimas de graves violaciones de Derechos Humanos y Derecho Internacional Humanitario(Universidad EAFIT, 2022) Aguirre Gómez, Matías; Viveros Montoya, Luis FelipeThe means of control of "direct reparation" is one of the procedural means through which the victims of serious human rights violations can satisfy their rights of access to justice as a matter of international law (Arts 8 and 25 ACHR), particularly the right to reparation. Access to this judicial remedy has several limits set by law, including the expiration rule. This monograph asks whether the expiration rule, as it has been interpreted by the Colombian Council of State, is consistent with the international obligations of the State to guarantee access to an effective judicial remedy that, inter alia, allows obtaining full reparation for the damage derived from the serious violations of international human rights law committed by the State.