Examinando por Materia "DERECHO PENITENCIARIO"
Mostrando 1 - 8 de 8
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Publicación Efectos de la intervención del juez constitucional en el derecho a la resocialización de la población carcelaria(Universidad EAFIT, 2016) Bonilla Alzate, Carolina; Londoño Ramírez, Alejandra; Hoyos Ceballos, EstebanPublicación El Sistema Penitenciario y Carcelario como servicio público: puntos de encuentro y divergencia(Universidad EAFIT, 2016) Solarte Álvarez, Juan Sebastián; Moreno Velásquez, CarolinaThis paper pretends to analyze critically whether the prison system is truly a public service or if it corresponds to the exercise of public/administrative functions -- To undertake this analysis, it will make an initial approach to the concepts and elements that compose the notions of public function, administrative function and public service -- Then, it will determine what has been the evolution of each notion along the time emphasizing on their differences, particularities and relationships -- Likewise it will make a conceptualization about what is the Penitentiary and Prison System and which are the norms, institutions, services, objectives and practices that compose it -- Finally, it will analyze if the functions, services and activities carried out in the Penitentiary and Prison System belong exclusively to the State or if it would be possible to set other models of provision inside Colombia's legal and constitutional regimePublicación Estado de cosas inconstitucionales en el Sistema Penitenciario Nacional colombiano y la necesidad de intervención de organismos internacionales (1998-2022)(Universidad EAFIT, 2023) Murallas Uribe, Luisa Alejandra; Gómez Pérez, María PaulinaThe Constitutional Court has defined as an Unconstitutional State of Affairs in prison and penitentiary matters the flagrant massive, generalized, systematic, restrictive and suspensive violation of a broad constitutional imperative and axiological catalog (which permeates, saturates and invades all the regulation of institutions, subjecting them to under parameters and philosophical assumptions as high as the principle of human dignity) in penitentiary centers mainly due to the inhuman and degrading conditions due to the lack of infrastructure, public services, health and overcrowding that the defendants face with “anticipated punishment without trial” and those convicted. As well as a criminal policy, incoherent, unstable, unsustainable, thoughtless, volatile, subordinate, populist, empirically unfounded, reactive, selective, discriminatory and lacking of a clear human rights perspective in the phases of primary, secondary and tertiary criminalization of the Colombian State. In making this decision, the Court has taken consideration the capacity of the penitentiary and prison centers, which is quantitatively 80,922 inmates. However, it has an estimated population of 97,289, corresponding to 73,099 prisoners that have been found guilty and 24,190 accused or unionized. Therefore, in response to the relationships of special subjection established between the administration and people deprived of liberty, that constitute a special position of guarantor on the part of the Public Administration based on international standards of respect for the dignity of inmates, the enjoyment effective of their inalienable and untouchable fundamental rights and in the face of the legitimacy of a normalized and dehumanized intramural detention that implies that in the end it remains fair "that the punishment entails a dose of suffering" this work proposes as a general objective to analyze the State of ThingsPublicación ¿Inocuizar o rehabilitar? Una mirada al enfoque de la política criminal colombiana(Universidad EAFIT, 2023) Galvis Sánchez, Laura Valentina; Correa Pineda, Manuela; Naranjo Serna, SebastiánIn contemporary societies, crime remains a phenomenon that negatively impacts the development and security of a society. Therefore, states must implement criminal policies with the goal of preventing crimes, punishing offenders, and rehabilitating them. However, in Colombian society, it is crucial to question the approach being taken with these policies, as it is evident that the decisions made in this regard are not aligned with the ultimate purpose of punishment, a situation that goes against constitutional provisions. Through this work, we aim to analyze the focus that has been given to criminal policy and the consequences that have arisen, as reflected in crime rates and the current state of the penal system. This is done with the objective of determining whether the decisions made genuinely seek to fulfill constitutional objectives or, on the contrary, are merely discourses aimed at legitimizing the inhumane treatment to which the incarcerated population is subjected. To this end, the first part of this paper will examine the purpose of punishment and the true discourse that underpins the perpetuation of this system. In the second part, we will address the definition and characteristics of criminal policy, contrasting them with what the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court establishes. Finally, we will analyze the need for reforming criminal policy.Publicación La prisión preventiva como negación de la dignidad humana(Universidad EAFIT, 2024) Trespalacios Carrasquilla, Santiago; Gaviria Mira, Jorge JuliánPublicación La redomesticación punitiva en el Sistema de Responsabilidad Penal para Adolescentes : una doble condena para las mujeres(Universidad EAFIT, 2023) Blandón Chica, Manuela; Moreno Obando, Juliana; Restrepo Echeverri, Estefanía; Toro Taborda, MarianaPublicación Mirada sobre el estado de cosas inconstitucional en el sistema penitenciario y carcelario colombiano : avances o retrocesos que ha generado su declaratoria(Universidad EAFIT, 2021) Barrera Betancur, María Camila; Serna Naranjo, SebastiánThe purpose of this degree paper is to analyze if the unconstitutional state of affairs declared by the Constitutional Court due to the prison and penitentiary crisis has been truly satisfactory or not for the process of overcoming the problem. In the first part, a brief review will be made of the meaning of punishment in doctrine, contrasted with what constitutional jurisprudence in Colombia has developed. The second part will contextualize the figure of the unconstitutional state of affairs in the matter, together with a detailed study of the Court's decisions regarding the crisis in prisons. After this, the effects of the declaration will be analyzed and finally it will be concluded with the Court decisions.Publicación Mujeres cabeza de familia marginalizadas en el sistema penitenciario : una reflexión de las decisiones judiciales que aplican la Ley de Utilidad Pública(Universidad EAFIT, 2025) Álvarez Pizarro, Isabela; Toro Taborda, Mariana; Ninguno.