Examinando por Autor "S. BOTERO"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    El giro político-cultural en los estudios del poder urbano
    (Universidad EAFIT., 2012-01-01) S. BOTERO; Departamento de Humanidades; Estudios de Filosofía, Hermenéutica y Narrativas
    This article aims to rescue the political foundations of urban political analysis, leaving behind its economism. To this end, this paper establishes a dialogue between this sub-discipline of political science that studies "urban power" and Cultural Political Economy, a new theory that seeks to re-explore the possibilities of political economy after taking seriously the cultural and linguistic turns that have become widespread on the social sciences in the last two decades. The contribution is then centered in examining how the theoretical changes introduced by CPE, and particularly those that draw on the contributions of Antonio Gramsci, Michel Foucault and Chantal Mouffe, have an impact on the study of urban power, especially after adopting their concepts of hegemony, antagonism, discourse, power technologies and the process of co-evolution between discourses and institutions on which the EPC builds its main contribution.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    Ítem
    Intergovernmental relations in Colombia (2002-2010): A review of the community councils of government
    (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2012-01-01) S. BOTERO; Departamento de Humanidades; Estudios de Filosofía, Hermenéutica y Narrativas
    This article analyzes the Community Councils of President Uribe under the theoretical framework of intergovernmental relations and relational strategic approach of the State. From the analysis of 55 of the 306 Community Councils, the article concludes that these instruments were an integral part of the transition from the munici pal decentralizing stage and the new momentum of presidential interdependence. This new categorization suggests leaving behind an understanding of decentralization in terms of autonomy and separation, defending the need to read it also in terms of administrative and political interdependence, just as it is done in contemporary analyzes of federalism.